PENILAIAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RISIKO (Risk-Based Bank Rating)

Authors

  • Masnawati Bank Pembangunan Daerah Kalsel
  • Meina Wulansari Yusniar Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Abdul Hadi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20527/jwmthemanagementinsightjournal.v1i3.184

Keywords:

Healthy banks, Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, Capital

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze techniques of the bank’s health assessment and determine which strategies should be done in order to improve the health of the bank. The method used is the approach of Risk (Risk Based-Bank Rating) in accordance with Bank Indonesia Regulation on Rating Bank that PBI Number:

13/1/PBI/2011 which entered into force on January 1, 2012. Bank health assessment performed using four (4) factors: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earning, and Capital.

 

Object of this study is PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan period 2012. The results showed that the health of banks in PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan getting ranked 2, meaning can be categorized good. Strategies to improve the health value of a bank is to improve aspects of Earnings and Capital. Strategis Steps that must to increase credit expansion, improve the quality and quantity of human resources, product innovation, and increase fee-based income

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awojabi, O & Amel, R 2011, ‘Analyzing Risk Management in Bank : Evidence of Bank Effeciency and Macroeconomic Impact’, Journal of Money and banking, issue 22, hal 147-162. <http://www.eurojournals.com/JMIB.htm> [12 Februari 2013]

Bank Indonesia 2005, Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 6/10/PBI/2004 tanggal 12 April 2004,

Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum, Jakarta

Bank Indonesia 2011, Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 13/1/PBI/2011 tanggal 15 Januari

, Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum, Jakarta

Bank Indonesia 2011, Surat Edaran No. 13/24/DPNP tanggal 25 Oktober 2011, Penilaian

Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum, Jakarta

Bank Indonesia 2012, Booklet Perbankan Indonesia, Jakarta

Bank Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Laporan Tahunan 2007 s.d 2012.

Banjarmasin

Bukhori & Raharja 2012, ’Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan (Studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI

Frosdick, S 1997, ‘The Techniques of Risk Analysis are Insufficient in Themselves’, Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, hal 165-177. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/09653569710172937 16 Feb 2013

Kasmir 2008, Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Kasmir 2009, Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Kmec, P 2011, ‘Temporal Hierarchy in Enterprise Risk Identification’, Management

Decision. Vol. 49 No. 9, pp 1489-1509.

Kuncoro, M 2009, Metode Riset untuk Bisnis & Ekonomi. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta. Hanafi, M. Mamduh 2009, Manajemen Risiko, edisi kedua. Penerbit Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu

Manajemen YKPN, Yogyakarta.

Hartono, Jogiyanto 2012, Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-

Pengalaman. Edisi Kelima. BPFE : Yogyakarta.

Idroes, N Ferry 2008, Manajemen Risiko Perbankan. Penerbit PT. RajaGrafindo Perkasa, Jakarta.

Peter, V & Peter, R 2011, ‘Risk Management Model: an Empirical Assessment of the Risk of Default’, Journal of Risk and Diversification, issue 1, hal 6-18.

Pujiyanti & Suhendra 2008, ‘Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Mengenai Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode CAMEL (Studi kasus pada PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk dan PT Bank Bukopin Tbk periode 2006-2008)’.

Sekaran, U 2006, Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis, edisi pertama. Penerbit Salemba

Empat, Jakarta.

Sihol, K & Pangaribuan, D 2007, ‘Penilaian Kesehatan Bank Dengan Metode CAMEL: Studi Kasus pada PT BPR ABC’, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 1 No. 2, hal

-186

Surat Keputusan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Nomor : Kep.117/M- MBU/2002 tentang Penerapan Praktek Good Corporate Governance pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN)

Tampubolon, Robert 2004, Manajemen Risiko Pendekatan Kulaitatif untuk Bank Komersil, Penerbit PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta

Utama, IMK & Dewi, KAM 2012, ‘Analisis CAMELS: Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia’, Jurnal Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, Vol. 8

No. 2, hal 139-148 [tanggal akses 15 Februari 2013]

Varotto, S 2011, ‘Liquidity Risk, Credit Risk, Market Risk and Bank Capital’, Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp 134-152. <http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/17439131111122139> [16 Februari 2013]

Zacharias, O & Mylonakis, J 2011, ‘RASM: A Risk-Based Projects Auditing Selection

Methodology for Large Scale Programs’, Journal of Risk and Diversification, issue

, hal 72-86. <http://www.journalofriskanddiversification.com> [12 Februari 2013]

Downloads

Published

2013-11-22

Issue

Section

Articles